GRADING RUBRIC
Name
__________________________ Date ______________Class______________________
Exceptional
Admirable Acceptable Amateur
|
Grade
|
Excellent
=A
|
Very
Good =B
|
Acceptable
=C
|
Needs
Work =D
|
|
Organization
|
Extremely
well organized; logical format that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly
from one idea to another; the organization enhanced effectiveness of the
project
|
Presented
in a thoughtful manner; there were signs of organization and most transitions
were easy to follow, but at times ideas were unclear
|
Somewhat
organized; ideas were not presentedcoherently
and transitions were not always smooth, which at times distracted the audience
|
Choppy
and confusing; format was difficult to follow; transitions of ideas were
abrupt and seriously distracted the audience
|
|
Content
Accuracy
|
Completely
accurate; all facts were precise and explicit
|
Mostly
accurate; a few inconsistencies or errors in information
|
Somewhat
accurate; more than a few inconsistencies or errors in information or incomplete
|
Very
inaccurate and/or incomplete; the facts in this project were misleading
to the audience
|
|
Research
|
Went
above and beyond to research information; used additional material beyond
what was provided; and utilized many types of resources to make project
effective
|
Did
a very good job of researching; utilized materials provided to their full
potential; used several types of resources to enhance project.
|
Used
the material provided in an acceptable manner, but did not consult any
additional resources
|
Did
not utilize resources effectively; did little or no fact gathering on the
topic
|
|
Bibliography
|
Bibliography
is complete and adheres to the MLA format.
|
Bibliography
is complete but has some format errors.
|
Bibliography
is complete but does not adhere to MLA format.
|
Bibliography
is incomplete and not in correct format.
|
|
Creativity
|
Was
extremely creative and presented with originality;used
a unique approach that truly enhanced the project
|
Was
creative at times; thoughtfully and uniquely presented
|
Added
a few original touches to enhance the project but did not incorporate it
throughout
|
Little
creative energy used during this project; was bland, predictable, and lacked
“zip”
|
|
Cooperative
group work
|
Enthusiastically contributes ideas to group; meets
or exceeds deadlines
|
Is
agreeable to doing assigned tasks; meets dealines.
|
Completes
most of assigned tasks, but needs reminding
|
Whines,
bickers, turns work in late.
|
|
Shared
Responsibility
|
Responsibility
for task is shared evenly
|
Responsibility
is shared by most group members
|
Responsibility
is shared by 1/ 2 the group members
|
Exclusive
reliance on one person
|
|
Group
Interaction |
Excellent
listening and leadership skills exhibited; students reflect awareness of
others’ views and opinions in their discussions
|
Students
show adeptness in interacting; lively discussion centers on the task
|
Some
ability to interact; attentive listening; some evidence of discussion or
alternatives
|
Little
interaction; very brief conversations; some students were disinterested
or distracted
|
|
Roles
Within Group
|
Each
student assigned a clearly defined role; group members perform roles effectively
|
Each
student assigned a role but roles not clearly defined or consistently adhered
to
|
Students
assigned roles but roles were not consistently adhered to
|
No
effort made to assign roles to group members
|
Exceptional
Admirable Acceptable Amateur