|
Grade
|
Excellent
=A
|
Very Good
=B
|
Acceptable
=C
|
Needs Work
=D
|
|
Organization
|
Extremely well organized; logical format
that was easy to follow; flowed smoothly from one idea to another; the
organization enhanced effectiveness of the project
|
Presented in a thoughtful manner; there
were signs of organization and most transitions were easy to follow, but
at times ideas were unclear
|
Somewhat organized; ideas were not presentedcoherently
and transitions were not always smooth, which at times distracted the audience
|
Choppy and confusing; format was difficult
to follow; transitions of ideas were abrupt and seriously distracted the
audience
|
|
Content
Accuracy
|
Completely accurate; all facts were precise
and explicit
|
Mostly accurate; a few inconsistencies
or errors in information
|
Somewhat accurate; more than a few inconsistencies
or errors in information or incomplete
|
Very inaccurate and/or incomplete; the
facts in this project were misleading to the audience
|
|
Research
|
Went above and beyond to research information;
used additional material beyond what was provided; and utilized many types
of resources to make project effective
|
Did a very good job of researching; utilized
materials provided to their full potential; used several types of resources
to enhance project.
|
Used the material provided in an acceptable
manner, but did not consult any additional resources
|
Did not utilize resources effectively;
did little or no fact gathering on the topic
|
|
Bibliography
|
Bibliography is complete and adheres
to the MLA format.
|
Bibliography is complete but has some
format errors.
|
Bibliography is complete but does not
adhere to MLA format.
|
Bibliography is incomplete and not in
correct format.
|
|
Creativity
|
Was extremely creative and presented
with originality;used a unique approach
that truly enhanced the project
|
Was creative at times; thoughtfully and
uniquely presented
|
Added a few original touches to enhance
the project but did not incorporate it throughout
|
Little creative energy used during this
project; was bland, predictable, and lacked “zip”
|
|
Cooperative
group work
|
Enthusiastically contributes ideas to group; meets or exceeds deadlines
|
Is agreeable
to doing assigned tasks; meets dealines.
|
Completes most
of assigned tasks, but needs reminding
|
Whines, bickers,
turns work in late.
|
|
Shared Responsibility
|
Responsibility for task is shared evenly
|
Responsibility is shared by most group
members
|
Responsibility is shared by 1/ 2 the
group members
|
Exclusive reliance on one person
|
|
Group
Interaction
|
Excellent listening and leadership skills
exhibited; students reflect awareness of others’ views and opinions in
their discussions
|
Students show adeptness in interacting;
lively discussion centers on the task
|
Some ability to interact; attentive
listening; some evidence of discussion or alternatives
|
Little interaction; very brief conversations;
some students were disinterested or distracted
|
|
Roles Within
Group
|
Each student assigned a clearly defined
role; group members perform roles effectively
|
Each student assigned a role but roles
not clearly defined or consistently adhered to
|
Students assigned roles but roles were
not consistently adhered to
|
No effort made to assign roles to group
members
|